_
x
> I love you all (♥ó㉨ò)ノ♡
_
x

Welcome to my blog! ヾ(◍’౪`◍)ノ゙♡ I reblog a lot of video game related material, utaites, text posts, music, art, and anime, especially: Free! ES, SnK. Feel free to message me and start conversation, I love it~

_
x

notherebyaccident:

Photos of kids going to school in various parts of the world.

_
x
posted 6 hours ago, with 943 notes
_
x
posted 6 hours ago, with 243 notes

harunafuu:

Somehow I stumpled upon Èterire, a newly established otome game company when I was searching for AGF 2013 goodies. They catched my interest with their pure and simple homepage design, so I clicked through their few pages. Èterire wants to create games, that will stay in the player’s memories and I’m kind of really looking forward to their works right now.

Their first announced game for the PSP is 宵夜森ノ姫 (Yoiyo Mori no Hime), which means lit. The Princess of the eve forest.

The unaccessible deep forest

There is yet no information about what this game is about, but looking at the art and the introduction it seems to have a mysterious and tragic theme.

The artwork is done by くにみつ Kunimitsu and there seem to be at least 2 dateable characters with German names available yet.

  • Klaus (CV: Maeno Tomoaki)
  • Erenfried (CV: Suzuki Chihiro)
_
x
posted 7 hours ago, with 99 notes

redricewater:

Praise the lord that is Break Record!!!!! THANK YOU ATLUS!!!!!

_
x

tastefullyoffensive:

Spaghetti Hamster Photoshop Battle [via]

_
x
posted 7 hours ago, with 51 notes
Track らいおんハート
Artist ばずぱんだ×ちょまいよ
Album
Plays 258 plays
album art unavailable

gottaloveutaite:

Lion Heart (acoustic arrange) - Buzz Panda & Chomaiyo

Original - SMAP

_
x

kawaiibunny3:

Every Main Character Magical Girl

Dec. 1966- Aug. 2014

_
x

lightspeedsound:

becca-morley:

adventures in school

I can tell these are all high schooler stories because there’s nothing about professors getting drunk with you

_
x

k-eke:

The new season is about gymnastic and rap battles, I’m so hyped !

_
x

bobafettishism:

I’m a teacher and today two new students signed up at my school - three year old twin boys. Their names are Sora and Riku.

That generation is here.

It begins.

_
x

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.

High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.

But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

_
x

wellheyproductions:

cuntsman-sniper:

destielkills:

twowandsandadrink:

totemo-kawaii—ne:

omgtsn:

shittingllamas:

dudewhodoesthings:

kystokeable:

sizvideos:

Watch it in video

No. 

No this is not funny.

Whether or not it is a joke, I’ve gone onto the channel and there are multiple videos similar to this, which makes me think they’re fake.

Doesn’t matter. 

These videos enforce the idea to parents that yes, the answer to stop your child becoming obsessed with games is to DESTROY them.

No. This is not funny. It is things like this that cause events such as the father who SHOT his daughter’s laptop to bits to occur. These jokes enforce the attitude that people are ‘wrong’ for loving games.

For wanting to play games. 

For some people (including myself), games are a serious escape from horrid realities. The only escape some people can get. The idea that this man (boy?) is wrong for being so upset is disgusting to me?

This is horrific. This is abuse. This is wrong.

This is a sure fire way to get your kids to hate you.

do people not understand how much video games cost?

Video games are a multi-billion dollar business. Some people are good at it. Very good. Do not squander your child’s talents, help them realize them and strengthen them. There are other ways to get your child outside without destroying their games and everything they work for. This won’t solve anything; this will only set them back further.

do this to your childs anything and they will automatically hate you/not trust you

It doesn’t matter what it is

It doesn’t matter if its their video games or if its their smoking pipe

If you just destroy it/throw it away, you are giving no explanation as to why it’s bad/you don’t want them to have it

This can actually psychologically mess a kid up because you teach them that if someone doesn’t like something, they should destroy it

That can lead to some serious problems with socializing with others and other things

dont do that to people

dont

I had a notebook I used to write in all the time. I did that thing that Margo did in Paper Towns where she criss crossed her writing, but I did it so I’d have enough room to write everything. I took it everywhere wtih me and wouldn’t let my parents even start the car unless I had in in my lap. My dad got really annoyed by this and said I needed to throw the notebook away, what was written in it wasn’t important anyway (it was to me, very much so). So one day he took and ran it through the paper shredder.
Ever since I’ve had an intense fear of losing my notebooks and currently have a colletion of 53 blank notebooks and 16 that have been written in because I’ve started hoarding them.
Long story short, don’t fucking do this to your kids. You think it’s harmless and some people even think it’s clever, but you’re really just an asshole and are causing actual psychological problems for your children.

I have a plush rabbit that I’ve had since Easter of the year I was born (I was about 2 months old when I got it). It quickly became a comfort thing for me and I used to go everywhere with it as a child. When my mum and dad split up was when I became kind of dependent on having it around.
If ever I did anything wrong mum always threatened to take it away from me, which obviously caused my 6-year-old self to kick and scream and cry because I needed it.
One day I lost it for 6 or 7 months (turns out it was in my room the whole time but shh it was very well hidden & neither myself or my mum know how it got there)
That was the point that my mum realised she couldn’t threaten to take it away because holy shit I changed so much in those months.

Seriously, if your child is dependent on something, or takes great comfort in having it around
DO NOT TAKE IT FROM THEM.
It does not matter how old your child is, what their comfort item is, if it’s a video games console - don’t take it from them. If it’s their phone - don’t take it from them. If they’re 18 and still sleep with a teddybear - don’t take it from them.


This also goes for if your child is self-harming. If they have a blade in their bedroom and you find it DO NOT THROW IT OUT. Talk to them about it, be as supportive as you can, but do not think “oh well if I get rid of it they’ll be fine”. It can be seriously distressing and also lead to them becoming creative with what they use.

Now, mind you, I have no issue with playing video games for a living, or writing in journals or plush animals or whatever… but FUCK… none of you have suggested what really needs to occur here:

PARENTS NEED TO TALK TO THEIR KIDS!

There needs to be a level of communication between both parent and child that allows the parent to parent and the child to grow. Destroying what your child loves will only result in one of three things: Deep hatred and distrust; A driving force to prove the parent wrong; and/or a fear of losing what is sacred to the child.

I could really give two shits if the lawnmower video is real or not, but what it demonstrates is that it was easier for the dad to destroy what he though was the issue, rather than sit down and talk to his son and find out what the real problem is.

Who’s at fault? BOTH OF THEM.

The dad is a shitty half-ass father. And the son could have made an effort to explain why these games are important to him.

It should NEVER have gotten to this point because probably neither of them talked to each other, and that’s what all of you should be addressing. 

the last comment has it right, parents need to talk to their kids, they just can’t pin a 20 dollar bill to their collar and wish them the best of luck.  That’s a recipe for failure, and the parent has no one to blame but them self. 

The father in this video has NO FUCKING CLUE was long term damage he has done to his relationship with his son. As soon as Junior here moves out… he is GONE. Never to be seen again, and Dad will always wonder “How come my son never calls me to say hello?”

'CUZ YOU DESTROYED HIS CHILDHOOD, YOU LAZY FUCK!

_
x

mightyhealthyquest:

IT’S ALWAYS TEA TIME!

_
x

blithelyblonde:

Always reblog.

_
x
posted 1 day ago, with 177,791 notes

postmodernismruinedme:

vardaesque:

unusualjourney:

what-rabbit-hole:

“some historians think that michelangelo was drawing god in a human brain. very few people knew what one looked like at the time; but michelangelo had dissected cadavers and would have known. it even has the hint of a brain stem. if true this would have been a great “fuck you” to the pope whom he was not friendly with but also would have meant god was in a human brain, or created by man.”

Interesting.

also michelangelo painted a baby angel flipping off the pope

image

the blond one, you see his right hand? that’s called the fig and it’s an old world european gesture for ‘fuck you” because apparently Pope Juluis II was a total raging asshole and everyone hated him

but nobody ever noticed this little fucker because the ceiling was so high

and then thirty years later they called michelangelo back to paint the wall behind the altar and he wasted no time in painting the gates of hell behind the pope’s chair

what a badass

It amuses me to this day how much Michelangelo hated his job